I am an attorney acting on behalf of my client in this matter. It has come under his attention that an emolument attachment order was served on his employer under case nuber: 5166/12. He does not bear any knowledge of this debt and has never heard of nor borrowed any money from the plaintiff, Experato. The judgement was obtained in Kimberly (jurisdiction???) in terms of a consent to judgement on which my client's signature was forged. I have experienced this with Flemix & asso on more occasions than I have space to mention. They blame the tracing company for the forged signatures but fail to explain why the client was targeted in the first place as they did not loan any money from the plaintiff. It begs the question are they targeting unsuspecting members of the public in claiming monies on behalf of their clients which are not due? If the judgement against my client is not rescinded within 7 days from date hereof and removed from his credit record, we will proceed with legal action and we will further proceed to report them to the Law Society of the Northern Provinces if they fail to provide sufficient explanations for the abovmentioned.
0 comments