Hollard Insurance
Rejection of Claim without legal ground

Business & Finance

I lodged a claim at Hollard through our broker Bidvest for a claim dated 08/10/2013, claim #790074-1. Our claim was rejected according Hollard due to the fact that my son was not named as the principle driver. BUT according to our Policy Schedule, Insurance Cover details, "Drivers for this Vehicle, state: No restricted drivers. Also under the Important Information it state that there are an additional excess for drivers over 25, other than principle driver. "Driver over the age of 25, other than the principle driver, an additional R1 500, 00". No where in this Policy documents does it state that a driver must be named as Principle or that a claim will be rejected if not. Numerous emails was send and no written response received. The vehicle is damaged and need to be used on a daily basis and additional damages can occurred due to the delay on the repairs.


Company: Hollard Insurance
Country: South Africa
City: Gauten
  <     >  

RELATED COMPLAINTS

Budget Insurance
Claim Rejected

MiWay
Rejection of claim - with no valid reason

Auto And General
Claim rejected

Hollard Insurance
BAD SERVICE

Hollard Insurance
FANTASTIC

Finrite Insurance Administrators
Retrenchment Claim Repudiated

Virgin Insurance
Valid Claim Rejected - Virgin Insurance

Hollard Insurance
BAD SERVICE "with hollard it's sorted" really now!

Hollard Insurance
Rejection of claim without doing proper homework

Hollard Insurance
Please pay the claim